This report looks at one of the most important yet contested political processes in South Sudan: the process of drafting a permanent constitution. It takes a social science perspective and focuses, in particular, on the dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in the constitution-making process. The report argues that temporary constitutions negotiated in closed settings can increase conflict levels within a country. In South Sudan, for example, the President failed to prioritise the review of the Interim Constitution. While it is difficult to conclude whether this decision was deliberate or not, it undoubtedly reinforced power contenders’ beliefs that the only possibility they had to renegotiate the political settlement was through violent means.
repository
Continue to search the repository
You might also like
Some Infos
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor.
Pages
- About Our County Profiles
- Blog
- Case Studies Grid
- Central Equatoria
- Conflict Sensitivity Resource Facility South Sudan
- Contact Us
- Contribute a Repository Article
- County Profile HTML links
- County Profiles
- COVID-19 HUB
- Covid-19 information page
- CSRF About Us
- CSRF Helpdesk
- CSRF Helpdesk Form
- CSRF Login
- Dashboard
- Deliverables
- Demo
- Events
- Forgot password
- Guides, Tools and Checklists
- Helpdesk
- Home
- Latest
- Looker Studio
- Subscribe