The aim of this chapter is to cast an anthropological eye over the issues of local knowledge, famine relief, and development theory, using the case of southern Sudan to reveal structural weaknesses in the ways local people are seen and represented in conventional development discourse. Information produced by anthropologists has often been praised but subsequently ignored by development practitioners (Saleem-Murdock 1990). Anthropologists have done little to resist being pushed aside on matters of policy as a result of the increasingly introspective direction that overtook the subject in the 1970s and 1980s. However, that period of introspection did produce a heightened awareness of the structures of power that lie behind the production of anthropological knowledge and subsequently gave anthropology the opportunity to examine the power structures that lie behind development discourse (Gardner and Lewis 1996).
repository
Continue to search the repository
Some Infos
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor.
Pages
- About Our County Profiles
- Blog
- Case Studies Grid
- Central Equatoria
- Conflict Sensitivity Resource Facility South Sudan
- Contact Us
- Contribute a Repository Article
- County Profile HTML links
- County Profiles
- COVID-19 HUB
- Covid-19 information page
- CSRF About Us
- CSRF Helpdesk
- CSRF Helpdesk Form
- CSRF Login
- Dashboard
- Deliverables
- Demo
- Events
- Forgot password
- Guides, Tools and Checklists
- Helpdesk
- Home
- Latest
- Looker Studio
- Subscribe